It's the end of the world as we know it.
If we ignore all this political crap will it just go away?

And the world didn't end after all

As expected, Trump was not found guilty of impeachable offences, as nobody in his Senate was willing to shout out  "You're Fired". It is interesting that there was one dissenting Republican, Mitt Romney, who said that his religion and his oath to the Constitution meant he could not give Trump a 'pass' on this.  This meant Trump couldn't claim it was a partisan witch hunt.  However, Donald did dismiss the vote as coming from a 'failed Presidential candidate", so he didn't really count it in.

Today Trump made a speech, to brag about his impeachment win.  It is a very long speech, and rambling, but it's worth it for anyone wondering what thoughts are rattling around in there. I found it insightful. An hour and a half long too, but it doesn't really start until after 25 minutes, and the last 30 minutes is a series of very folksy anecdotes about his people. I ran it at 1.25 speed too, once I got bored with his slow pace. I think POTUS needed a STFU, but nobody is going to say that.

He was rambling and mostly off the cuff, with just a few notes. The scary thing is I think he really believes the things he is saying, such as how unfair this all was and how great he still did, rising above adversity better than any other President would have. It was a speech full of both resentment and celebration. He claimed that the last four years, and before, in his campaign, politics in the US was, and is, nasty. Many people are crooked, with lots of dirty tricks, and have a desire to destroy the US. He means his opposition, I assume.
 
So what's next? I see Trump continuing to test his boundaries, knowing he now holds a lifetime Get Out of Jail Free card. We heard his defence claim that as long as the president acted in what he thought was the best interest of the country – in this case, being re-elected – there was no impeachable crime. It's a stretch, but that could extend to not just bribery, but martial law and opponents that 'disappear'.  Why not? Gerrymandering will accelerate, to control the vote. He will change the impeachment rules, and Putin and he will run a nasty campaign.  William Barr, Trump's AG, has announced that before the FBI can start to investigate any campaign irregularities, they have to get the AG's approval. So, there's another problem solved, right? 
 
As tempting as it is to just ignore all this, I can't. I'm not in the US, but these events and this deranged leader affect not just the US, but Canada and the rest of the world. And it diminishes democracy there, and by extension everywhere, by trying to normalize this mess. I'll keep posting my thoughts, maybe not daily, but whenever they start bubbling up. I'll keep following what I consider reliable news sources, such as the Washington Post and the Guardian. Not ignoring the biggest #FakeNews site of all, Tump. 
 
And I'll keep reading the excellent commentary by a historian, Heather Cox Richardson.
 
And I'll get out and do stuff and talk to sane people, just to let my brain cool down. 
 
 
Links:
 
 
 
Supreme Court ruling that gerrymandering is not an issue for the courts. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/27/us/what-is-gerrymandering.html
 

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Sam Steele

Your belief that fact checking leads to integrity is misguided.

Let's consider the Second World War in Europe as an example of "facts" we've been hearing about and evaluating for 75 years. We've learned about the Battle of Britain, the Atlantic convoys, Dieppe, D-Day, buzz bombs, dam busters, Dresden, Omaha Beach, Juno Beach, General Patton, Monty, El Alamein, FDR, Churchill, Eisenhower and that the Canadians liberated Holland. Assuming every one of these things is a fact, they do nothing more than obscure the truth about that war. The truth, with complete integrity, is that the Russians bore the full brunt of Germany's war effort without any significant help, suffered and overcame a massive invasion of their country with about 27 million dead, and eventually regrouped and drove the Germans all the way back to Berlin in a total victory.

If you had personally fact-checked every article in the Washington Post about WW2 from 1939 until today, would your truth have any integrity?

Ravens

Sam - my initial point was that fact-checking of Trump consistently shows that he lacks integrity. He lies, repeatedly and frequently, which all the fact-checking sites show. Hence my view of him as the worst of the "FakeNews sites.

But you seem to have more issues with the "truth" about WW2. All the events you cite did happen, as well as the very significant Russian involvement. After they had signed a pact with Germany, a pact that was broken. Coverage of all the war's events can vary of course, depending on the bias of the one documenting it, be it an author, politician, or historian.
Here's a Wiki article with many links to follow up on. All part of the truth, as opposed to conspiracy theories, such as claims the events in Auschwitz did not happen.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Union_in_World_War_II

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)