The Next Day's Thoughts
And the world didn't end after all

It's the end of the world as we know it.

Okay, maybe the R.E.M tune isn't called for yet, but we're getting there bit by bit. Sort like the story of the frog in the pot of water, that doesn't notice the temperature gradually rising until it's too late. 

I watched the SOTU last night - AKA the State of the Union. It was a fantastic extravaganza, a reality TV show hosted by a master showman, a campaign rally targeting his base and anyone else with a preference for bumper sticker style politics. I was expecting at one point all the Republicans would be told to bend over and look under their seats for a prize. Unfortunately, they'd only see their own asses, which is where all too many of them have inserted their heads. I did appreciate that Nancy Pelosi followed up his theatrical bombast with a small gesture of her own - she tore up his speech. 

Trump kicked off with a long list of facts and figures, touting his success as the anointed saviour that, over the past three years, has dragged the US back from the brink of disaster. And he promising more of the same largess in the future, an even better US, with a strong economy. As usual, most of what he said was 'alternate facts' (a Kelly-Anne Conway phrase). I prefer the term un-truths. Or lies. The fact-checkers had their usual easy time annotating his speech, as he often repeats the same whoppers, but his base won't care. Any contradictions of their Supreme Leader are from the failing #FakeNews organizations, the policy wonks, the elite - none of them to be trusted. Trump told them that himself, and he said he'd never lie. 

He seemed confident as he displayed his power. A scholarship was given to a young black girl with a single parent mother (of course) so she wouldn't have to attend one of the 'failing government schools'. We call them public schools. A young photogenic military spouse, with her two little children, was a special guest. Her husband was overseas protecting US oil interests and was expected home soon. Or, right then, as Trump waved him down the balcony stairs for a tearful family reunion, in a Price is Right "Come On Down" moment. A 100-year-old veteran was repeatedly praised, but lost the toss for the night's Medal of Freedom. That went to Rush Limbaugh, in recognition of his years of misogynistic and racial rants on talk radio. He's said to have paved the way for Fox "News", and the White House release says he "has had an incalculable effect on American politics and government". They got that right.   

So, I think the US, and by extension, its neighbours, are still sliding to the brink. Tonight Trump will be acquitted, of crimes that he admitted to. His defence claims what he did is not impeachable, and his Republican Senators, eager to hold onto their power, will agree. There might be a court challenge, but it's his Supreme Court. He will get a bounce from today's result, as well as from the SOTU, but will it hold until the November elections? Will the Democrats field a strong opponent? Will more evidence surface? Most certainly there are more witnesses, more allegations, but Trump himself bragged at a 2016 rally "I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose voters." 

We laughed back then. 


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Jersey Kozinski

Thank you for summarizing the SOTU speech.

Dividing the world into "people who correctly think like us" and "deplorables" is a trick (i.e. quote) of Hillary Clinton, not Trump. None of the other Republican candidates in 2016 would have beaten Clinton, so despite (or because of) his many faults, Trump gets credit for saving the world from her.

If we suppose that most of the people who were introduced by Trump last night were his supporters, is it possible to imagine that any of them are sane, rational, open-hearted and friendly people? Is it possible that his "base" tolerates and in some cases champions the blowhard Trump because they believe the alternatives (Clinton, Biden, Sanders, Warren) are worse?

For some different news stories, you might consider the tech-biased Hacker News or the "we are in a massive financial bubble created by the central banks"-biased ZeroHedge

scott parso s

Incredible commentary Mike. Should be widely circulated.


Jersy - I'm not sure what you think life in the US would have been like under Hillary over the last four years, as opposed to Trump. Depends on what news source you believe, I guess. I looked at your recommendations, but don't see why they would be sources I can depend on for fact-checking and integrity. My main sources are The Guardian and The Washington Post, with some CBC and CNN added in. You may want to consider this site for some suggestions -


Scott - thanks very much. I considered pasting the whole thing in Facebook, but I'm convinced many people just click a 'like' without even reading.

The comments to this entry are closed.